By: Hazrath Moulana Abul Fatah Syed Nusrath Tashrifullahi
The last of all prophets of God, Muhammad, May Allah bless him and give him
peace, made a very significant prophecy when he said that: -
“How can my Ummah perish when I am at it’s beginning, Jesus, son of Marry,
at its end and the Mehdi from my progeny will be in the middle of it. But in
between this, there will be a large detracted group. Neither I belong to them
nor they belong to me.”
The above tradition has been quoted in Musnad of Imam Ahmad from Ibn Abbas (RZ),
by Abu Nu-aym Isphahani from Ibn Abbas, in Kanzul Ummal from Ali, in Mishkat and
it’s commentaries Mirqat and Lumu-at from Imam Jafar and Razeem, by Hakim from
Abdullah Ibn Umar (RZ), and in Tafseer-e-Madarik with some variance in words.
The tradition elucidates the following:
(i) that Mehdi (pbuh) and Jesus (pbuh) are not one and the same person as a
group tries to make people believe
(ii) that they will not come or live at the same time, one being in the middle
and the other at the end of the Ummah
(iii) that they would be saviors of Ummah in the middle and the end of it as the
Prophet (pbuh) himself was at the beginning
(iv) Imam Mehdi (pbuh) and Jesus (pbuh) would follow the Prophet as saviors.
This means that they would be Caliphs of God and hence free from error and that
their guidance too would be free from flaw.
The number of traditions about Imam Mehdi is very large. Perhaps on no other
single issue so many traditions could be found. Some of them are sound and some
weak. Some traditions do not pertain to Imam Mehdi, but traditionists placed
them under the chapters allocated to Mehdi.
A multitude of earlier Muhadatheen (Scholars of Hadith) belonging to Sunnah and
Jama-ah believed that from all these traditions, two things are definitely
One, the advent of Imam Mehdi is a religious must, and
secondly, that he would be a descendent of Fatima (RZ), daughter of the Prophet
They believed that these two things are established from continual
Mehdi – The Caliph of God, not a Monarch.
Now a days, Muslims are disgusted with the state of affairs especially with the
widespread corruption, corrosion of faith and un-Islamic practice of those who
happen to be at the helm of affairs. They like to believe in myths holding out
promises of a sudden change bringing about political domination of Muslims all
over the world under a Monarch called Mehdi. They also fail to distinguish a
right interpretation in the light of Qur’an and the otherwise. Even in respect
of sound traditions people do not appreciate the symbolic nature of predictions.
They tend to go with what is apparent and not with the appropriate intrinsic
sense in the light of Qur’an.
The Prophet (pbuh) predicted that, after him, there would be a plenty of
traditions. He told the followers to accept the traditions that agree with the
Book or else, reject them. But the lofty hope of a world-wide Islamic Empire,
set up over-night by Mehdi does not let people put such traditions or even their
wrong interpretations to the acid test (comparing with Qur’an) given by the
Prophet (pbuh) himself.
Thus, some people vehemently expect of their long
awaited Mehdi as follows:
(i) that he will be a Monarch of the world
(ii) that under his rein, all men and women living on the earth will eventually
become Muslims, leaving no disbeliever, perhaps without putting him to sword
(iii) That he will fill the whole earth with justice and equity as it would be
filled with in-justice and in-equity
(iv) That he will conquer the city of Qustuntunya
(v) That he will be a King of Arab, etc.
Let us examine briefly, the first
It is accepted by all that Imam Mehdi would be a descendent of Fatima (RZ). some
people saw no harm in buying the concept of a Muslim rule over the entire world
converting it to Islam. Consequently, no disbeliever will be left and if at all
left, he will perhaps be put to sword. This idea was anchored on the following
words appearing in several traditions.
“He (Mehdi) will fill the earth with
justice and equity as it would be filled with in-justice and in-equity.”
The word, Al-Ardh (meaning the earth) can also mean land, country,
region, area etc.
Nevertheless, people who hold the view that Imam Mehdi will capture
unprecedented and unlimited political power, prefer this word to mean only the
planet Earth. Grammatically, the preceding “AL”
(Alif and Laam) can also make the word to specify a part or some parts of the
earth instead of the whole earth. In that case the prophecy would mean that Imam
Mehdi would spread justice in a part
or some parts of the earth or amongst the people belonging to different parts of
the world. The whole earth was never filled with justice. This has never been
the way of God.
“(Shu-ayb (pbuh) told his people): “hence, O my people, (always) give full
measure and weight, with equity, and do not deprive people of what is rightfully
theirs and do not act wickedly on earth by spreading corruption.” (11-85)
The word, “Al-Ardh” (Earth) in the above verse refers to Madyan only, where
Shu-ayb (pbuh) was sent as a prophet and it does not mean the whole earth.
The concept of all the people of the world becoming a single brotherhood under
Islam and practicing justice and equity is also conflicting with Qur’an.
Qur’an says thus:
(i) “therefore, we have stirred up enmity and hatred among them till the Day of
Resurrection: (Al-Ma’idah: 15)
(ii) We have cast among them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection”
The first verse above pertains to the Christians and the second to the Jews.
These verses indicate
that Christians and Jews will exist until the Day of Resurrection and the enmity
and hatred among
them will also remain until that day.
The following verse makes it clear that the notion of all the nations
amalgamating to become a single Muslim nation clashes with Qur’an:
(iii) “And if thy Lord had willed, He verily would have made mankind one nation,
yet they cease not differing” (Hud: 118)
Giving guidance is not in the hands of even Caliphs of God. It is within
exclusive domain of God.
(iv) “ If God willed, He could have brought them all
together to Huda (guidance) so be not thou among the ignorant.” (Al-An’am: 35)
(v) “If we had so willed, we could have given every soul it’s Huda (guidance)
but the word from Me,about evil doers, took effect that I will fill hell with
the Jinn and mankind together.” (As-Sajdah: 13)
(vi) If thy Lord had willed, whoever is in the earth would have believed, all of
them, all together. Wouldst thou then (Muhammad) compel people until they are
believers? (Younus: 99)
(vii) And we cut them up into nations in the earth, some of them righteous and
some of them otherwise; and we tried them with Good things and evil that haply
they should return.” (Al-A’raf: 168)
(viii) And they will not cease to fight with you, until they turn you from your
religion, if they are able (Al-Baqara: 214)
Traditions of the Prophet (pbuh) also show that this idea is a pure myth:
(i) Imran Bin Hasan (RZ) related that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said that
one or the other group of my Ummah will never cease fighting for the truth until
the last of them will fight with Anti
Christ (Dajjal). (Abu Dawood, Mishkat).
(ii) Sauban (RZ) related that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said that once the
sword will be put (to use) amongst my Ummah, it will never be withdrawn until
the Day of Resurrection.
(Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi, Mishkat).
The above traditions show that battles will be fought within the Ummah itself
and will continue until the Day of Resurrection. Thus, the idea that all the
people becoming a single brotherhood under Islam is contradictory to Qur’an and
Hadiths of Prophet (pbuh).
Please also note that Jesus Christ (pbuh) too had prophesied about coming of the
last of prophets Muhammad (pbuh) as “Ruler of the world”.
“I will no longer speak much with you, the ruler of the world is coming”
What Jesus (pbuh) said was nothing but truth and his prophecy came true with the
Muhammad (pbuh) as Mercy of the worlds (Rahmatul-lil-Alameen). However, he did
not rule over the world as worldly kings do. True, he was the ruler of the world
in the incorporeal sense of the biblical term and not in the corporeal sense. He
was ruler of the world because salvation, success and prosperity in life here
and the hereafter of the entire mankind depended on believing in him and obeying
him with love. This is why Allah declared in the last of His books that:
“One who obeyed the Messenger, indeed he obeyed Allah”
True, billions of men did not accept him and his “guidance”, yet he (pbuh)
remains a ruler and a true ruler of the world. And then remember, neither he
(pbuh) nor Jesus (pbuh) nor Mehdi (pbuh) had to
be “kings” to guide the people and to spread justice among them. They had to be
Caliphs of God and Saviors of the people who accepted and obeyed them. That is
why the Prophet (pbuh) urged people to accept and obey Imam Mehdi in the
“…then will come Caliph of God, Mehdi. As you hear about him, go to him,
swear fealty to him even if you had to crawl over ice, since indeed he is the
Caliph of God” (Ibn Majah)
Hence, the real promised Mehdi (pbuh) whose chief identification was the most
perfect following of the Prophet (pbuh), was to be a Caliph of God and not a
worldly “king” and that his rule was to be
incorporeal and he had to fill the earth with justice to the extent Allah
Mehdi, the Caliph of God and not the king of Arab:
Some people expect Mehdi to be king of Arab. The idea is based upon a tradition
appearing in Tirmidhi as narrated by Abdullah Ibn Umer (RZ). The Arabic words “
Yamlikul Arab” are translated as “King of Arab”. The Arabic word “Malaka” has a
wide range of meaning including to
possess, to own, to lay hold, to take over, come into possession or control of,
dominate, have power or authority over, hold sway over, over-whelm, to rule,
reign etc. Now, to speculate from the words “Yamlikul Arab” that Imam Mehdi
(pbuh) will rule over Arab as a king, directly clashes with the notion of his
being a monarch of the world.
Secondly, it is neutralized by the very next tradition in the same Tirmidhi
Shareef and also narrated by Abdullah Ibn Umer himself. The text of both the
traditions is the same, however, the words
“Yamlikul Arab” have been replaced, in the second tradition, with the word “Yali”.
This Arabic word “Yali” has several meanings such as, to be close, to be
in-charge, to be friend, to manage, or to rule etc. The word “Arab” does not
appear in the second tradition. This contradiction in the two versions of the
same tradition renders the speculation of Mehdi being a king of Arab most
Thirdly, the word “Yali” can be used for a father or head of the family too.
Similarly, the word “Malik” can also be used to denote the head of the family.
This is evident from the two traditions noted in the commentaries of Qur’an,
Zahidi and Ma-alimut Tanzeel, as given below:
1) It is related from the prophet that he said that one who owns a house, a wife
and a servant, he is a “Malik”.
2) Abdullah Ibn Abbas (RZ) narrated that one who has a home, wife, children and
a servant, and nobody can enter his house without his permission, is one of the
Muluk (plural of Malik).
Further, the word “Mehdi” does not appear in both the traditions. However, the
scholars of Hadith inferred that these traditions pertain to Imam Mehdi and
placed them under the Chapter about “Mehdi”. Even if the traditions pertain to
Imam Mehdi (pbuh), it means that he would hold God-given authority as Caliph of
Imam Mehdi did not have to Conquer Qustuntunyah:
There are people who
believe that Mehdi has to conquer the city of Qustuntunyah to be a true Mehdi.
The fact is capturing the city of Qustuntunya is not at all a “sign” of Imam
Firstly, because there is no mention of “Mehdi” in the tradition predicting the
conquest as related from Abu Hurairah in the Saheeh Muslim, the earliest source.
Secondly, the commander of the army is expressly mentioned by the Prophet (pbuh)
to be a descendent of Isaac (pbuh) (Banu Ishaque), whereas Imam Mehdi (pbuh),
according to a host of sound traditions, should be a descendent of Ishmael (Banu
Ibn Yousuf Maqdisi, a much later writer, expressed his view that it is suspected
that this Ameer may be Mehdi. How this misconception affected the minds of later
writers and scholars is evident from an example cited below in “Tanzeehul Fahwa”
by the late Allamah Syed Shahabuddin (RA):
Hadith in Saheeh Muslim:
“ Then, Jesus son of Mary (pbuh) will descend. Their “Ameer” will say, come,
lead us in prayer. He (Jesus) will say no….”
The same tradition reported
by Abu Nuayeem Ispha-hani is as follows:
“ Then, Jesus son of Mary (pbuh) will descend. Their “Ameer”, “the Mehdi”
will say, come, lead us in prayers. He will say no.”
It may be seen that Abu Nuayeem Ispha-hani quoted the Muslim’s Hadith in
verbatim but for the word “the Mehdi” suffixed to the word “Ameer”. Imam Muslim
(Died 216 Hijri) lived about two hundred years earlier to Imam Abu Nuayeem (Died
Imam Muslim’s compilation is accepted as most sound and reliable. .
Unfortunately, all such additions or conjectures no longer remained foreign.
Gradually they were assimilated. Hence the belief that Imam Mehdi will be the
Ameer of Muslims who will conquer Qustuntunya and will say prayer with Jesus
(pbuh) , and help him kill Dajjal etc. etc.
CONCLUSION: These and very many other imaginary “signs” and man-made
been blocking the way of seeking truth. The most reliable characteristic of the
true Mehdi is his
perfect obedience to Qur’an and following in the foot-steps of the Prophet
(pbuh) without a flaw.
During the whole history of Islam, Hazrath Syed Muhammad, son of Syed Abdullah
(847 – 910 H) has been the only person who called upon people to verify the
truth of his being
Mehdi and a Caliph of God by referring his deeds, words and conditions to the
Book of Allah
(Qur’an) and following the Prophet (pbuh) . He (Mehdi) said: I have placed
Qur’an before people
and I call them toward Tawheed (Monotheism) and Ibadah (Worship). He (Mehdi)
the object of Deen (Religion) before the eyes of masses. His life and message,
even now arouses the
spirit of Love of God.
May Allah guide us, Ameen.